Tax Reform Debate: KPMG Flags Major Errors in New Tax Laws
The Nigerian fiscal landscape is currently witnessing a high-stakes intellectual showdown as KPMG Flags Major Errors in New Tax Laws recently signed into effect. In a detailed technical analysis that has sent ripples through the organized private sector, the global audit firm identified significant gaps, drafting inconsistencies, and clerical oversights within the gazetted tax acts.
These documents, which form the bedrock of President Bola Tinubu’s ambitious fiscal reform agenda, are now the subject of intense scrutiny, with experts warning that the current discrepancies could lead to legal ambiguity, unintended tax burdens on businesses, and a potential loss of revenue for the federation.
According to the technical report released by KPMG, the errors are not merely cosmetic but structural. The firm pointed out instances where cross-references between different sections of the law are either missing or point to non-existent provisions. Furthermore, the analysis highlighted a worrisome lack of clarity regarding the commencement dates for certain levies, which leaves corporate taxpayers in a state of confusion over their immediate compliance obligations.
One of the most critical observations made by the firm involves the contradictory language used in the treatment of value added tax and personal income tax rates, where the text in the gazette reportedly fluctuates between different percentage benchmarks, creating a loophole that could be exploited or lead to unfair litigation.
However, the Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele, has stepped forward to offer a robust rebuttal to these claims. Oyedele maintains that while the committee welcomes constructive feedback, many of the issues raised by KPMG are based on a misunderstanding of the legislative intent or the use of outdated versions of the bill.
He argued that the gazetted version underwent rigorous vetting and that the “errors” being referenced are often intentional simplifications designed to modernize the tax system. According to the committee lead, the reform is built on a “people first” philosophy, and any minor drafting issues will be addressed through supplementary circulars rather than a total legislative overhaul.
This clash of perspectives highlights the complexity of transitioning Nigeria to a more efficient revenue collection model. While the government is eager to implement these changes to stabilize the economy, the insistence by KPMG on an urgent and formal review suggests that the business community remains wary of “rushed” legislation.
READ ALSO: China, Russia, and Iran Flex Naval Power in South Africa as Global Tensions Escalate
The debate now shifts to whether the National Assembly will need to pass an amendment bill to rectify the flagged sections or if administrative clarifications from the Federal Inland Revenue Service will suffice. For now, stakeholders are advised to maintain a cautious approach to tax planning as the government and the private sector negotiate the fine print of these transformative laws.